Who holds the balance of power?

I suppose it may well depend on the definition of ‘power’ we each subscribe to….

Why do supposedly powerful people require the adulation of those they deem irrelevant?

Why would an emperor lay on events to please his subjects?

If we look at the very simple example of music superstars: they have to run around on stage, give everything they have, to excite their audience. The audience would pay whatever they’re asked to pay in order to watch those superstars and groupies would scream their lungs out. The stars crave and feed on the adulation, the fans expect to be treated to spectacular performances….. do the maths..

Some would argue that in society, power belong to the people. But a few elected (supposed representatives) wield said power? On occasion (when they have to run for office and secure votes) those individuals are held accountable to an extent.

Ultimately, we all have a shelf-life. None of us are here forever. So, presumably we all face the same certain end. Legacy or no legacy…..