Knowledge can improve the world we live in

Taxes continue to go up, prices up (today my wi-fi company increased the monthly bill by 20%), but we are frustrated when workers go on strike to demand an increase in wages…

Many of us do not work in sectors where we can go on strike, but I can definitely understand why those who can, are going on strike! Things cannot continue as they are!

It is a truly sad period for the UK. I have always said freedom of speech doesn’t come with freedom of consequence. Society must have zero tolerance for hateful comments that incite hate regardless of whom it targets. But to seek to punish or silence a sportscaster for drawing a parallel between speeches made by the government and that made in 1930s Germany, is stepping into an uncharted territory. We say we want to learn from history, we say we must learn from history, but when a comparison is made, we say “how dare he?”

The steps the UK government are trying to take, in taking control of the border, has nothing to do with pandering to the right. These are very necessary actions – but I still believe there are better tech-based solutions – and it must and will have to be done, sooner or later, unless we get rid of all borders and shift to a “whose land is it?” world, where we level the playing field, scrap currencies (find a global trading medium), mechanise agriculture worldwide and get the entire world working as a single equitable society – but we’re nowhere near that yet, and as such, for the moment, we must enforce our laws and that includes making our borders secure and getting all entrants to go through due processes and routes. BUT what is the need for the accompanying rhetoric? Do we need a government that sounds like illiterates having a rant in online chat rooms? There is absolutely no need to use the choice of words that’s been used to date. There is absolutely no justification for it. It takes so much away from the work the government is doing, in sorting a mess that people want sorted but nobody wants to be the one to sort it! It is a thankless job and you are damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Nobody in the UK will benefit from an uncontrolled border where people smugglers are exploiting their victims and boating them across. It means the government can’t prepare for them, it means they face a tough, uncertain future here, and their kids will end up growing up filled with hate. Intolerance will continue to brew as poor folk in the country will feel let down – a problem that has already led to several flashpoints this year. If the government can just quietly – without the horrible wording – get on with what they are doing, then criticisms from the likes of Gary Lineker, will focus on the actual context and he will have no reason to compare the words to 1930s Germany. Perhaps politicians deem it easier to move an agenda forward if they get the public behind it and perhaps in this instance, the government felt that borrowing words from what they see as the mainstream, is going to have that effect? But the government must surely try to rise above that. The government should not use words such as ‘invaders’ for instance. There is honestly, no need for those types of words. The government should just get on with doing what needs to be done and leave the colourful wording to others.

Calls for Lineker to be punished and indeed, his removal from his BBC programme tonight, shame us all. It is an action the BBC will regret, because even if they reverse the decision, it is already too late. BBC have lost public support this week. Even the right-wing folk who disagree with Lineker, know that the BBC’s action in punishing him, is not right. The BBC have gone down a slippery slope from which it is clearly impossible to climb back from.

I have always been a staunch supporter of the BBC and even after this saga, I still cannot see any press anywhere around the world that will ever be as decent as the BBC, even with its flaws – the BBC and the ethos behind it, is set up to be a force for good, but I suppose nobody is perfect. This situation with Lineker is a terrible mistake by the BBC.

The government should put an immediate end to the use of horrible words, while just getting on with doing the very necessary work they are doing and leave Lineker and others to comment on the context of the actions and we won’t have this distraction, which was caused by the insistence on descending into the gutter to find phrases that demean migrants who are a mix of folk truly fleeing persecution, some exploiting the system, some exploited by people smugglers and some caught up in it all. They are all still human beings and even if some people see them as invaders, those should never be the choice of words used by our elected officials. Their job should be to sort the mess out. Leave the flowery words to illiterates in online chat rooms

It is just so sad that we have allowed ourselves as a country, to descend into such farce! There is no coming back from this! The BBC have created a precedent that is now going to keep popping up to haunt them..

The world has certainly taken leave of its senses (if it had any to begin with?!)!!!

Yes, racism must be awful and yes, it exists as there are indeed many brainless people out there who would seek to harm or disadvantage others, simply because they do not look like them. And the convenient collective use of terms such as ‘white’ or ‘black’ to lump people together and just categorically state what they stand for, is obviously laughable. BUT, for goodness sake!!!! not every societal ill or any slight or disparaging remark is sourced out of racism!!

This morning, I read an article relating to the 11-Academy Award nominated movie that features Michelle Yeoh whom many will recognise from several Chinese films but in particular, Crouching Tiger: Hidden Dragon from 2000. The article complains that she found Hollywood racist and claim she was once told: “oh, so you speak English”!
Well, for goodness sake! If I was a known Bollywood superstar and one day show up in China, speaking fluent Mandarin, possibly some may be surprised and mention it?
I am not declaring that Hollywood is a racism-free zone, I am not in the movie business and couldn’t comment, but for crying out loud! How many Caucasians or Africans or Indo-Pakistanis have become superstars in the Chinese movie industry? Do they feature them? When Michelle was winning every award in Asia for her Chinese films, did she spare a thought for people who can’t be in Chinese films as they don’t fit in?
Yes, Hollywood should represent a free for all talent scenario, regardless of where people are from, if there’s a movie to be made, use the best qualified folk. But as it is in the U.K., if we continue to produce a bunch of “period dramas” supposedly based on the 1700s or 1800s, having an African play Lord Burnley or the Queen, is clearly not going to be realistic, unless we all ditch our silly spectacles and accept a play or film is not real, and even if it is biographical, and Matt Damon plays Mandela, then in the context that we all know he is just “playing” Mandela, what could be wrong with that? Who has seen God? (well, he’s been “played” by all sorts of actors and actresses over the years right?). Until we get to the point where people can understand that anyone can and should be able to play anyone, we cannot complain too much, if Chinese movies are not filled with Caucasians or if a Malaysian lady or Chinese lady finds there are not a bunch of roles to play in Hollywood (after she spent decades at the top of the pile in Hong Kong). To try to phrase this as racism is just bizarre

Creativeness or Creativity is what’s required. And perhaps, a bit of common sense from the viewing public, to break down the silly barriers that can open opportunities to actors and actresses where ever they wish to work, if they have the required skills to do so, same as for most vocation. But if creativity is lacking, and a period drama is only deemed authentic if Caucasians play Caucasians and the storyline must reflect historical fact, then the blame (and possibly stupidity) is on us all, the viewing public.

Everyone wants to have a moan! But given the opportunity, we are probably as bad as each other

The same may apply to some other essential services e.g. nurses and other medical staff, albeit, it could be argued that medical staff dealing with sick folk, pandemic or not, is a core part of their job description. But goodness me! I just read an old article that had pictures of our post-boxes overflowing with Covid test kits; these all had to be handled by postal staff, at a time when nobody really know for certain, how long the virus could survive on surfaces. Those brave postal workers – while the rest of us were hiding away in our homes to avoid getting infected – had to handle such potentially lethal mail, putting themselves and their families at huge risk.

Yes, the demands by every worker for increased salaries isn’t really going to solve anything, as the money has to come from somewhere; and the more money that’s handed out, the higher prices will soar. So, what would be the point?

The government should have looked into what it has in reserve and as the pandemic eased, every postal worker should have been paid a tax-free, life-changing sum of money in gratitude, as a bonus. Perhaps £30,000 each?
Now, that will also have an impact, as many may then choose to go and set up a business and stop working; so, there could be a condition to stay in service for at least 12 months after receiving the bonus – to train new postal staff

If we had all stayed at home during the lockdown, then this sacrifice made by some of the essential services that enabled our ability to stay at home e.g. those who got food to us, kept the electricity, water and gas going, should all receive bonuses. Yes, most of the country kept working from home as possible, but those whose work made it possible for the rest of us to be able to stay at home, should have been rewarded with such bonus.

We should not, as a society, now be locked in these incessant strikes and threats of strikes as workers demand pay increases that even if granted, are highly unlikely to make much difference for obvious economic reasons that really isn’t the fault of the government. One strike will simply lead to the next and the next…….

What is abundantly clear though, is that we don’t have any real thinkers left. All we have is a modern-era of leaders who worry more about opinion polls and tweeter feeds etc. We are in trouble!!!

If you googled El Salvador a month ago, it would have been a long list of homicides with some horrific images. Today, you google El Salvador and it’s been horrific images – perhaps meant to deter? – of human beings being bundled like sardines as they arrive at El Salvador’s new mega-prison. Is this the successful outcome they are after?

No, I do not have an answer or “the” answer to the problems El Salvador have faced over the years, but how long before some of the prison guards begin selling drugs and shanks etc to these supposed gang members?

Building a 60,000 capacity prison and banging up tens of thousands of heavily tattooed gang members in it is as much a solution as Puncho Villa printing Mexican money in an endless supply and thinking it will be worth the paper it’s printed on!

The cost of this mega jail and staffing it, maintaining it, would perhaps be much less than the cost of building schools, hospitals, creating jobs, giving hope to the poor, while tackling some of the social issues that drive people to join gangs. But hey! too simple!

But the images that have now circulated around the world, of human beings being packed up like sardines, can only surely paint a picture of hopelessness! How can this be a sustainable outcome? Yes, you may immediately get an impact in reducing crime for a couple of weeks or months, but then, you are brewing up a calamity! Several kids without their parents – some will say that perhaps this absence gives those kids a chance, as they would have been destined for the same gangs as their missing parents – but this will only ever be positive, if the El Salvador government has the Next Steps ready, following the mass incarceration. What’s next? Will the families of these incarcerated folks get some support, to help them exit this vicious cycle? will the incarcerated men we see packed like sardines suddenly have a change of heart in a mega-Jail in punitive conditions that do not seek to rehabilitate (and how successful has the rehabilitation of gang members been to date?)? You can’t lock them up indefinitely.

What happens when the popularity of the El Salvador president wanes (which is inevitable as I doubt the families of 60,000 incarcerated people will be rushing out to vote for him at the next election – if they ever have one…)?

Those images depict a human tragedy of epic proportion! The world must find a way to sort these situations out. Such a sad, sad period for El Salvador and that region.What can they do to turn things around? (the wave of crime that led to their president taking these drastic action was equally dreadful)

Well, Sir John, the colossal mistake was in calling a referendum on a matter so complex, that after so many years, we are all still trying to unravel it all. It’s like holding a referendum on how to cure cancer! What good would the outcome of such a referendum do?

But the Brexit referendum was called nonetheless. That, is the colossal mistake!

The exit itself was unavoidable. To overturn the result or try to undermine it, would have most likely led to a public revolt. To what end?

The sooner everyone (Britain, the EU) came to terms with this situation the better. We just have to make it work and get on with it. The EU of course, cannot let go as it will lose its deterrent and others will seek to exit, but in my humble opinion, the EU should not worry about deterrence; focus on making it the best choice for its members, get better and let Britain and any others considering exiting, see what they are missing. As for Britain, we all need to stop crying over spilt milk, so many mistakes got us to this juncture. We are there now, so, let’s just get on with it and try to prove the EU wrong by making post-Brexit UK work. This should all be a healthy competition to try to prove a point to either side. There is no need for malice! If post-Brexit Britain does well, fine. Kudos. If post-Brexit EU do well, fine, kudos. Unfortunately, that is perhaps too simplistic for us human beings to accept…

Governments can’t do it all.

where is parenting? where are the parents? Yet another teenager (Brianna Ghey) was stabbed to death in a park – No, not in Yemen or Somalia – here in the U.K.!
I dread turning my computer on these days as the news headline is always the same: a bunch of so called ‘county line’ drug dealers getting sent to jail or yet another stab victim or the recent trend is some angry person who punches another and they fall, hit their head on the pavement and die; effectively ending two lives as one dies and the other is lost to the prison system and reoffending…

Yes, our government (and others in our so-called developed countries) is distracted: net zero, climate change, ULEZ, shooting down Chinese spy balloons and other UFOs (with all the tech we say we have, can America not send up a drone to puncture a balloon and capture it intact, to confirm exactly what it is? instead, like a crazy cowboy film, out comes the missile and they shoot it down, then spend hours searching for it in the ocean? jeez! Come on Yankees, you need to up the tech! deflate the blasted balloons, get them analysed and let’s have an accurate position!), while all that’s going on, we are watching mindless killing, be it in needless wars or by knife-carrying kids on our streets, when indiscriminate zero-tolerance is what’s now clearly needed. Not random stop & searches, how about drones and cameras with X-ray vision, sensors and alarms that pick up knives and guns or other metal on anyone as we all move about and alerts the police. Yes, intrusive, but it is now clearly very necessary. Instead of ordinary CCTVs on trains, street corners etc, install x-ray type smart cameras that screen ALL of us indiscriminately anytime we’re out of our homes or mandate every home, every car to install sensors or cameras hooked to a police centre, put officers on round the clock (it will be cheaper and more effective than stop & search). Yes, there will be objections, but with the number of lives already lost this year alone, this really has become a pandemic!

“Mayor of London Sadiq Khan has announced that he plans to invest £8.5 million to tackle violence in the capital after 16 people were stabbed and one shot dead in the last five days” – in the news today. 16 in just the last 5 days!!

But we cannot sit back and blame the government. Where is parenting? How are these teenagers feeling so at ease about carry knives and using them?! It really is hard to contemplate! Parents must do more!!!

Many conspired against him, tried to hold him back. Yes, he isn’t without his faults, but a Serb from a tiny nation with no tennis history, continues to prove his point!
Well done Novak!

I cannot see any situation in which the Army would take over government in the UK. Why? because they have a basic, fundamental understanding of their purpose. In recent weeks, with the incessant strike actions in the UK, we have seen the army drafted in to help and when we have national emergencies, you see the army show up to help. The principle of the purpose of the military is very clear and the leadership of our military are never in doubt about that. Unfortunately, in developing countries, with coup d’etat as commonplace as early morning tea, that fundamental principle was either never instilled or poorly instilled. They probably mean well when they intervene, but the fact is that such a situation simply shouldn’t arise. The military should never step in to govern or attempt to do so; not even for a day! Any intervention (in those developing nations) if deemed as the only option, should always be followed by an immediate (same day) installation of a caretaker government ahead of a prompt election.

With the police in the USA, a very similar, basic fundamental is missing: the police should not manhandle their employer i.e. the public. It just shouldn’t happen! Race, affluence, location should have nothing to do with it. There is the police and there’s the rest of the population. One is there to serve the other. It really is that basic! One should never disrespect the other. They are each there because of the other! When you watch videos such as the latest one released this week, of a chap – now deceased – in the US, Tyre Nichols I think his name is, the questions are brutally fundamental. We may not be perfect here in the UK, but I simply cannot see a situation where someone who is not suspected for armed robbery or a violent crime, suddenly finds himself surrounded by that many cops. What are they doing there???? If assuming he was stopped by one police car for traffic violation and was not cooperating, he is only one guy! no sight of a weapon – as they had already dragged him out of his car – so, why cannot one or a maximum of two cops stay to tackle the situation? Surely they must have some standard procedure??? 1 x unarmed guy, move on, leave the two cops on the scene to tackle it, even if he struggles and they spend a bit of time sorting it – he would still be alive today!

It seems that in the US, driving is a cardinal sin or perhaps the most risky thing to do, as it appears driving offences is just a pretext for their cops to stop you and from that moment you are stopped, anything can happen. The manner in which they dragged the fellow out of his car say it all. In what job on earth, would an employee approach the employer in that manner? It is such a fundamental flaw in US law enforcement. Members of the public are the employer! If/when they err and find themselves on the wrong side of the law, YES, they should face consequences, but these extra-judicial killings in America by those employed to serve & protect, is absolutely unacceptable. But when people make statements such as “defund the police”, instead of a review of the fundamental issues, we fixate on the slogan and waste valuable time castigating the slogan, instead of dealing with the issues. The locos in American politics will shortly come out with their usual deflection…

How such barbarism can continue unchecked, in a supposedly ‘developed’ is just mind-boggling!!!

It really has got way out of hand!

The lives being so casually and callously taken! Each life touches on hundreds of lives; parents, siblings, friends etc. Some urgent action needs to be taken in London and this is not just about law enforcement! There’s only so much the police can do. This matter needs to become the only topic on every agenda, with programmes urgently put in place to explain just how much hurt, the taking of a single life causes.

I think we have all become so nonchalant about this topic!

We have allowed it to become normal in London.

Where is the public outrage?

Something must be done urgently. This cannot become London’s normal…

The matter is quite simple: if she was/is rubbish, at least she has the decency to step down, not dragged out or encourage her supporters to riot. But most importantly, where is the long list of others anywhere, male or female, who have not had any detractors?

There is absolutely no need to turn this into a battle of sexes. Wait till the announcement comes in a few days that she has been made the UN envoy to some place or the head of some international bank. Man or Woman, politicians never walk away for nothing or to nothing

I haven’t listen to her quit speech – unlikely I will – but people can make whatever they want from it, only she would know her exact reasons for quitting and it remains her prerogative

From the little I saw or read, she always held herself decently and was for decency; those are very rare qualities these days – and I am not just referring to leaders or politicians – we have failed as societies.

Good luck to her and hope she does well wherever she resurfaces.

I saw the article below online yesterday (some of the information was previously on TV):

It was only after George Michael’s death that it became clear that he was spending millions to help orphans, the homeless, the sick and simply troubled strangers. Some stories from eyewitnesses who will reveal the true face of George Michael:

A contestant on the TV show “The Deal” said on air that she needed £15,000 for the IVF procedure. The next day, Michael called and secretly transferred the full amount to him. (c) Richard Osman, television presenter.

George Michael worked anonymously at a homeless shelter where I volunteered. I didn’t tell anyone about it because he asked us not to say anything. That’s how he was. (c) Emelyne Mondo, actress.

A lady from a children’s charity told me that the only reason they still exist is because of George Michael. (c) Kate Waugh.

Every Easter year, when Chris Tarrant and I were hosting a Capital FM event to help the kids, George Michael would show up at 3.30pm and donate £100,000 (c) Mick Brown, DJ.

He gave £25,000 to a stranger in a café because she was crying over a debt. I wrote a check and asked the waitress to give it to the woman after she left. (c) Victoria vector.

He organized a free concert for the nurses who cared for his late mother. (c) Andrew.

His donations helped create a world where people living with HIV could live healthy lives without prejudice or discrimination. (c) Jane Barron, representative of Terrence Higgins Trust.

I wrote an article a long time ago about a famous man who tipped a bartender £5,000 because she was a medical student in debt. That man was George Michael. (c) Sali Hughes, journalist.

He was also the only star of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (as you know, the winnings of the stars of this game are transferred to charity), who said: “If I lose, I will deposit the money myself.” (c) Sali Hughes, journalist.

Since 1996, George Michael has donated all proceeds from the song “Jesus to a Child” to charity. He transferred millions who saved hundreds of thousands of children. For many years he was the most generous benefactor to give money to Childline. However, Michael was determined not to go public with his generosity, so no one outside of charities knew how much he had given to the country’s most vulnerable children. (c) Esther Rantzen, founder of Childline.

And hundreds of thousands of people are still alive because of him.

While majority run around hating on each other. RIP GEORGE MICHAEL!

Nothing wrong with constructive criticism relating to things that do need to improve. But when some individuals start spewing hate, in the name of whatever and for whatever reason, when they have the very easy option of heading elsewhere (and I don’t mean “go back where you’re from”. Nobody owns anywhere and we are all only here b6 chance and none of us will live indefinitely), it does make my blood boil! Yes, the UK is not a perfect place, but hate and negativity won’t improve anything!

If you don’t like it here, just go on Google, research other countries, find one that you consider to be better and just move there. The funny thing is, when things go awry over there, you will then hear such folk asking the UK government to hurry up and get them out!

If progress is slow, throw in more positivity!

I didn’t vote for Brexit but could see how the anti-EU hysteria got stoked over the years, to the point where people felt they can take any repercussion to get out of the EU. And the folk who should have commissioned a very thorough and accurate step-by-step of what the process of exiting the EU, cost, immediate, short-term and long-term impact etc., and communicated that clearly, instead chose to go down the “we will win any referendum anyway, as the ‘leave’ camp are bonkers” road and nobody really had the full facts. But all that is water under the bridge and not worth regurgitating

What is absolutely unconscionable is the continued fall-out! What do people want??
A return to the EU? Well, can someone gather the FACTS please?? timeline, cost, impact, and will it solve anything??

We are in a pickle and instead of wasting more time moaning about it talking about going back, why don’t we just face the music and get on with it???!!!

If Brexit was idiotic, attempting to undo it or sitting around moaning about its impact is twice as idiotic! What’s done is done. Let’s get on with sorting out a way forward and perhaps 5 years from now, there may be some side deals to explore with the EU, to get an associate membership of sorts, take on some of their stipulations, if that is all glaringly the only way we can stop people heading further into poverty as we have seen in the past 3 years!

Covid has had an impact. There is a global recession looming. It isn’t all just about Brexit!
Yes, the domino effect is perhaps the reason why are are seeing such a heavy toll in the UK, with more and more falling into extreme poverty.

Enough of the moaning though! We are where we are, it is time to focus solely on solutions.

A rail franchise Director said yesterday that we need to get people back out using the trains so they can survive. Well, funny that! Sort the incessant striking of the drivers, other rail union staff etc. and get reliability back and you won’t need to appeal to commuters to get back on the train, they will!

Mad times!!!!

Choice of words are so important! Why not just say: if you feel a sneeze coming or suspect you have a cold or any virus, please wear a mask in public, as a precaution. Or something along those lines….

The minute we make it sound like those wearing masks are those with a virus, few will choose to wear one!

I’ve seen people coughing and spluttering on flights saying: “don’t worry, it’s not Covid”. But if you ask them if they have recently taken a Covid test, they look away!

It doesn’t appear we have learnt much over the past couple of years! The government will sit by yet again till the only solution is another lockdown! Why not act now? Do the necessary now! So that we can avoid another lockdown!!

We head into yet another year, with the usual “the west is good” and “the rest bad” mentality that has defined the world for centuries. As I have repeatedly stated, I have absolutely no doubt that western intentions are generally set to try to do good and the advancement of women’s rights (e.g. to education, vote etc) and the quest for circular societies with democratically elected governments, freedom of speech etc., are all prime examples. But we have still not managed to eliminate and eradicate ‘hate’, ‘intolerance’, ‘inequality (and I don’t mean racial inequality, I am referring to the ever-increasing poverty) and disproportional targeting (e.g. sentencing, which keeps so many minorities in jail in countries such as the US or the focus on drug-dealers while the folk buying and consuming it are never pursued or prosecuted). However, even with the long list of issues we could do better with, millions continue to try to reach the west because we do not imprison people for insulting our heads of government or shut newspapers down because they dare to provide challenging views etc.

But circumstances and culture do matter. What works in the west is not guaranteed to work everywhere else. We have already seen that several times over the past millennium. Also, classing ‘difference’ as evil, is not correct. The west should be out to MOTIVATE and incentivise not strong arm. For instance, regarding Brexit, the EU should have applied incentives instead of threats of a dire aftermath. If we look at the Qatar World Cup as another example; yes, the LBGT and foreign workers situation is appalling, but do we think things will improve just because we try to shame them at the last minute? There were several years ahead of the event and opposition was muted, till the event kicked off! There is little to be gained from trying to embarrass Qatar; the issue should and must be raised as they were BUT respectfully and with pleas to their leadership for them to see why the world reacted the way we did. Their country, their laws, BUT asking the world over, means some compromises were required and I am sure they could relate to that. Now, the tournament is over, if the protests had been more respectful, now would have been the time to start fresh discussions to continue to push for those changes (respectfully!). The usual “we are good”, “you are evil” and you must change and do things the way we do approach has never and will most likely, never work

The ongoing war in Ukraine should never have started. Like most of us in society, I do not have all the facts and Russia’s reasoning, Ukraine’s logic, the west, etc. But of one fact I am very convinced, there was and is, nothing to be achieved through this war or any other wars! I read an article this morning that criticised Tony Blair for seeking to get Putin on the high table. We cannot continue to approach global politics the way we do. Other perspectives need to be taken onboard, even if they counter ours in the west! I am not saying Russia or China can be wooed into becoming exactly the same as a France or US, but who says which ones are good and which are evil?? It is clear that every country has its history of good and bad. The point is that we must try to keep everyone engaged, to see if that can prevent situations escalating to the point of war. But yes, appeasement also rarely work, we saw that with WWII.

But the present ‘good’ V ‘evil’ arrangement isn’t working either

By now, somebody, somewhere, should have got Putin and Zelensky to sit down to end the needless loss of lives in Ukraine. By now, discussions should be ongoing to end the madness in other parts of the world where other armed conflict are looking inevitable.

Unfortunately, everyone’s entrenched in their respective positions and there’s an all-round lack of trust, historical baggage etc. So, nothing’s going to change. It is what it is. Sadly

An additional 7 years has been added to Aung San Suu Kyi’s imprisonment, taking the total up to 33 years. She is now 77 years old I believe…

When you look at some of the charges she faced and has been jailed for, the implausibility is so obvious. What would someone like her do with embezzled funds? I mean, this is a lady who spent decades fighting for what she believed in. Unfortunately, it is doubtful many will come to her aid this time around. She had a chance to do the right thing when she was briefly in power – well, if she ever was really in control – and even if such power was limited behind the scenes, her words, her influence at the time, could have made a difference but she showed what many saw as her true colours and we saw what went on with those marginalised folk

Surely she must now see the precariousness of her position? Once someone the whole world respected and many campaigned selflessly for her freedom years back. Now herself a pariah and much as it is doubtful that the charges against her are fair or proven, she may now find her circumstances dire, with little to no international support this time around

Shortsightedness on her part?

What would it take for leaders to step back before falling off a cliff edge? So many of them over the decades, see doom coming, plough ahead and end up in peril! Seems a pretty persistent flaw…

As 2022 winds down, I sincerely hope – but doubt – 2023 will usher in better times.

It is so frustrating when you read about these so-called celebrities moaning about inequality? I am sure this John Amaechi chap is a great guy and all that. I am certain his is doing great things etc., but seriously!??? he gets selected for an extra or intensive search at Heathrow and yes, had he been Caucasian perhaps it would not have happened (as he and others have been stating) as I doubt Rod Stewart or Bill Gates or Elon Musk or Roger Federer would have been hit the same random selection jackpot, but if they had, they (like Reece Witherspoon did during her police stop some years ago) would have played the “do you know who I am” card, which is the exact same card John Amaechi should have played, if he wanted to play a card. To turn his experience into a racial matter and try to wrap it all into all the bias stuff, is just a little silly really! And if he is right and he has been targeted, what is the purpose of his outburst? to better his future trips or is it to help others like him avoid such an experience? The airports must do their jobs and try to keep us all safe! Yes, nobody wants to keep on getting selected for some additional, intrusive, humiliating searches, especially if you are a known celebrity who is highly unlikely to be a security threat, but the criteria cannot be based on that can it?

It has just become so dull and tiring! It is very ok for Amaechi to vent his frustration, if as he says, he is a frequent traveller and has not been a security risk, but keeps getting selected for these humiliating, supposedly random extra searches, I am sure that if he had just quietly raised the issue with the authorities, they may well ease up on him or check their random selection machine? But even if he felt a public outburst was best, it should have been made within the context of “why do you keep on selecting me??? I am a celebrity and a lot less risk than many unknown folk”. There was no need to try to imply the airport security staff or the system? select him for being black? or big? or whatever other reason he feels he’s been selected for. John, just say it as it is: you feel you are a celebrity and should be given special treatment! There it is! Simple. Others have said it, no problem with you saying it too. You are indeed a celebrity and if Federer has never been randomly selected, then perhaps you do have a case for being frustrated with your incessant random selection. Fair enough. But for goodness sake! don’t bring in the whole black thing! For starters, why are you black? (you are both black and white), half the world (China, India, Pakistan, rest of Southeast Asia, many Spaniards and Italians, some Caucasian Brits after a few weeks in Ibiza and many others are the exact same shade as you: are they also black?). But all that aside, every incident cannot possibly be down to discrimination! If I am wrong and it all is, then, what do I know??

No sadness, she was and is to be celebrated period! If more can see the world as she saw it, it would be a much better place for all….

The greatest footballer of all time: PELE.

RIP sir!

While he was alive, modesty leads to adding words such as ‘arguably’. The reality is that anyone with a half-decent appreciation of football will know that Pele was and will likely always the the greatest footballer – until someone else can surpass what he did. To date, nobody has. To begin with, he is the only man to have won 3 world cups. I doubt there is any child anywhere in the world, who knows what the round object called a football is, who doesn’t then know of the name ‘Pele’.

Essentially, you know football, you know the name Pele. Can’t say the same for any other past or present footballer

“Before the match, I told myself that Pelé was just flesh and bones like the rest of us,” Italian defender Tarcisio Burgnich said after his side’s defeat in the final. “Later, I realised I’d been wrong.” (1970 World Cup Final: Brazil 4 Italy 1)

All that aside, the fact that he faced huge challenges (the usual) but rose above it all, to secure the respect of everyone across the globe, is in itself phenomenal. His attitude, the joy, his philanthropy…… need I say more? RIP Pele..

Just read the BBC article relating to a blind chap who uses taxis to get to work (he is an organist) and several taxis refuse to take him as they don’t want his guide dog in their taxi. But the pick drunks who regularly throw up in their taxi right?

All form of discrimination is awful, but I am not sure there has been enough focus on discrimination against the blind and other handicapped people in society. These folk are largely left to suffer indignity in silence as we get carried away with other more typical forms of discrimination

Appalling really!

A young Hungarian flees persecution with his family and moves to the UK in 1947. György Schwartz. Who? Exactly! What if I said George Soros? Yes. Clever chap

Was Soros ashamed of his Hungarian roots? No.
Only an idiot would be sentimental about a name, when it is a handicap. After studying at London School of Economics Soros wrote to the Managing Directors of every Merchant Bank in the country seeking a job and he got one. Doubtful he would have received any responses as György Schwartz.

Yes, it shouldn’t be that way, but that is how it is. Ruby Wachs’ parents fled the Nazis in Austrian in 1938 and once they settled in America, they changed Wachs to Wax to fit in. Helen Mironoff changed to Helen Mirren not out of disrespect for her Russian father or heritage, it was the smart thing to do. And she isn’t being sanctimonious about it. She isn’t sermonising about it. You don’t hit fame and make money as Thandie Newton and then years later, sermonise! By all means say you now want to be called Thandiwe, good for you. But please, please, leave out the sob-story. Leave out the sermonising! There are thousands out there today, who claim they do not receive invitations to job interviews due to the names on their CVs.

If your name is a handicap, ditch the idiotic pride, change the blooming name!! If we expect a woman’s surname to be her “maiden” name, which is readily tossed aside upon marriage, then it’s all well and good that Soros, Mirren and others who decided to change their names did so..

Many English names today are from Greek, Latin etc. they got changed. It happens!

Majority of us earthlings won’t change our names as we perhaps do not need to or we are not in situations where our name is a disadvantage. But for anyone who feels a name change will help them fit in better or help them avoid subconscious biases, good for them! Change the blooming name!!!

Perhaps one day the world will get smart enough such that it wouldn’t matter a jot whether you are Sabaku or Smith. Sadly, we ain’t there yet. So, for the Sabakus who are now Smiths or the Mironoffs who are now Mirren, good on ya!

A chap loses his house of rep vote to Lauren Boebert by just over 500 votes, he didn’t ask for a recount and graciously conceded and congratulated her. Kari Lake loses her gubernatorial vote by over 15,000 votes, says she won and that she can never lose, says it was stolen from her, takes the case to court, judge throws it out, will she now renounce her statements and congratulate the winner, Katie Hobbs? Nope, our dear Kari will continue her crusade and carry on saying the election was stolen. Why? well, the reasons are quite obvious. One of those, is that she will be hoping to increase her profile within the election denials in America, which has now become another group out there, another base, another reliable voting block whom you do not need to state any policies to convince to hand their votes to you. But most importantly, because she will hope Donald Trump will select her as his 2024 running mate, and even though Kari knows he is going to lose again, she just needs the national publicity

Quite deplorable really. But that, is indeed today’s democracy!

It is is madness! Every election cycle, there will be some voters who will find it difficult to cast their votes either due to arriving late or long queues etc., it is never isolated to a single party. Some will be deliberately misled via fake phonecalls stating the election day has moved etc., these dirty tricks abound, but they have never been the basis of any real challenge to our democracy. Yes, it ain’t perfect, but Kari, stop taking the piss! You lost, now go away quietly!!

The Republican Party has to find the resolve to root these maniacs out, clean slate and return to being a credible political party! Tough, but hopefully doable

This is why we are Great Britain!

Regardless of the direction others wish for, the decent folk in the country will always stand up and speak up against indecency!

Well done Brits!

I haven’t yet had a chance to read the full BBC report, but hats off to Lady Hussey!

Hopefully the people hating on Ngozi can now leave her be. She is British and we should be happy that she is proud to say that. It is up to her, if she wants to qualify that with where her ancestors hail from, same as any Brit wishing to state they are from Norman (French) roots or Saxon or whatever can provide that qualification if they choose to. And if anyone wants to go as far back to Adam & Eve and use that to qualify where they’re from, fine. But it shouldn’t be dragged out of them or expected

Now, let’s draw a line under this matter and hopefully, the next person that gets asked those questions can just ask whoever’s asking them the same. And leave it at that.

For any individual to make the decision to train as a nurse is in itself a decision to help others. It is a selfless decision

Yes, it is just a job like any other and it is a personal choice. But once you go into the detail of what they actually do, and how they impact our lives, nursing is nothing like any other job!

As nurses embark on their strike action this week, it is extremely sad to see what society value more and what we are happy to pay for entertainment e.g. footballer’s wages..

The giver must tear up existing pay structure for nurses. We need to create a brand new salary structure for nurses; one that will truly reflect their unparalleled contribution

This cannot be about avoiding a domino effect on other civil servants. We must do the right thing. The current salary paid to nurses is an absolute disgrace!

The Biden government get basketball player Britney Griner out of Russia and they get lampooned with abuse! Yes, it would have been great to get both Griner and Paul Whelan the other American out, but for goodness sake! Some gratitude first!

Yes Griner was caught with a tiny bottle of cannabis oil – and she has most likely now learnt her lesson – but she could very easily have been stopped for any other reason (given everyone says she was just a convenient pawn right?).
The argument that the Russian released in exchange (Victor Bout) was a lopsided deal is dumb. Do people think Bout is the only arms dealer out there? Has his incarceration ended the illegal arms trade?
He’s already been in an American jail for 12 years and using him as a trade to bring Griner or anyone else home, was good value, if as it were, it was the only available deal to be done. Hopefully they will soon find a deal to get Whelan out too – and hopefully, like Griner, he would have also learnt his lesson and spend his next holiday in Paris or Florida instead?!

I was reading statements such as “the maths just wasn’t right”. Maths? What is wrong with people these days??? We are talking about human beings here! Who gives a deuce about the maths adding up!? A young woman who should have at worst, received a small fine for being silly, got caught up in politics and a hostage situation, ending up in a penal colony. Getting her out by trading a spent arms dealer who has already been locked up for 14 or so years. Sod the maths!

In the past week the Royal family in the UK have been set upon by a number of issues that have all been taken out of context and probably deliberately. The first involved an aggressive questioning of the head of a charity at an event, by a royal household lady. The episode is bizarre because we are a country where we accused former boxer Amir Khan of divided patriotism when his camp carried a British flag alongside a Pakistani flag (even though he wears the Union Jack all the time), but when Ngozi Fulani (the head of the said charity) stated she is British and the conversation should have been left at that (especially as she was born & raised in London), she is accused of lacking pride in her roots for not wishing to agree that she is not British and must dig up where her ancestors hail from and provide that response whenever asked. Essentially, she is expected to say: I was born & raised in Britain, but my parents were from xxxx. That is supposed to be the only acceptable answer because she doesn’t fit the description? However, if Helen Mirenovski (or Helen Miren) was stood in her place, nobody would ask her where she’s from right? (Helen’s awesome by the way; excellent lady). Why? we all know why. So, yes, it was an issue. However, there was absolutely no need for the melodrama. There was no need for the lady in question, Lady Hussey I think, to quit her position. There must be consequences for such behaviour and hers is the outing of the matter. If we are ever to get to the end of such sagas, it will take someone like Lady Hussey coming out with a statement condemning those who have, in her name, made Ngozi’s life hell since the matter was exposed. Lady Hussey should come out and publicly state that what she did was awful and made Ngozi feel inferior in her own country, but perhaps it was unintentional (I doubt Lady Hussey set out to be horrible), but the effect remain as it usually is. If we’re going to be asking where people are from, and they confirm but we want it to be where we think it is, then why not just say so. Then, ask the same question of everyone regardless of what they look like. And volunteer the same detail for yourself first, as I am sure Lady Hussey herself could claim her roots are from the Middle East, if the Bible is correct, we’re all from Adam & Eve right? And if it is Darwin who is correct, then we are all from Africa?
The notion that a Brit can be the daughter of a Russian immigrant called Mirenovski or whatever, drop some bit of it and be Miren, play the Queen on telly etc., but the daughter of a Caribbean immigrant who arrived here well before Mirenovski must forever have to explain why she surely must be from someplace else, is the exact definition of the ‘ism’ that people have been having major issues with recently. As for the Harry and Megan stuff, the royal family is smart enough to know that Harry will never reveal anything major – he may be a unhappy with how he feels he’s been treated, but he will never really do anything to seriously damage his family – and in fact, all the storytelling is keeping a once almost forgotten institution constantly in the press. And given the seeming overwhelming public negativity towards Megan for whatever reason people wish to hate her, this is not doing anything other than helping the royal family. There’s nothing Harry and Megan can put out there that’s really going to cause much damage to the royal family – the reasons they have survived has little to do with lack of scandals, they will be just fine. So, people can stop hating on Harry and Megan, there’s no need to hate them. They have their reason for being unhappy, those who wish to listen to them should, and those who do not want to, do not have to. I haven’t seen nor listened to any of their stuff and do not intend to, but I also do not have any reason to hate on them – they are human beings too. It is very possible that Harry should have done more to put Megan in the picture; Harry is the junior brother and the one who was always going to have to be happy with second place – which will be 3rd, 4th etc, depending on how many kids William has – and Harry would have been groomed to understand that all his life and accepted it (and let’s be honest, he isn’t the first to find himself in that number two spot is he? It is what it is. It is still not a bad place to be is it?). Till he met a spirited American woman who couldn’t understand that and should have been made to understand it, but perhaps nobody tried to – she couldn’t understand why her man has to stand behind in line etc. Now they are intent on being number 1 on the internet if they can’t be in lineage. It will all blow over son enough. I hope they stay together as they clearly like each other and their kids need them. I also hope that after they have exhausted their stories and made enough from Netflix, they will just let go. Yes, we get it, they perceive ill-treatment etc. And I do hope everyone else have also learnt something from this saga and can all be better. As for the public, and the online trolls and abusers, no hope there; that’s never going to change. You give people an uncensored channel, and that is what you will always get. It’s their chance to lash out and be horrible – we are very horrible beings in general..

This morning I read some articles attacking Canada’s Prime Minister of being a woke lefty and all sorts. When you read the accusations levelled against him, you see issues common with most leaders: a bit of arrogance, a bit of “I know what’s best for you”, but all in all, he is a million miles better than the last Prime Minister Canada had (Stephen Harper), but it doesn’t matter what Trudeau does, the fact that he appointed a handful of different-looking individuals in his cabinet was the woke tab firmly affixed and he will forever be hounded by a certain kind of folk, who will never really state why they hate him so much. They will pileup all sorts or reasons – but never state that real reason – which when examined, amount to much less than the past several Canadian Prime Ministers have done.
Many want a return to how things were in the 70s? Clean streets, few people all looking the same, turn the telly on and everyone’s the same, including all the commercials etc., say anything about anyone and you’re fine, only hire people who look exactly like you without any challenge etc. But the reality is simple: the time we are wasting trying to force a return to the 70s could have been spent getting new plans in place, to get our streets clean again, get people integrated and accepting our way of life, getting used to seeing a variety of different-looking people in our TV shows and commercials and getting on with today’s reality.

We lost to France at the World Cup yesterday via a missed penalty and in contract to our recent European Championship loss also via penalties albeit following extra time, the reaction is that England fans say they are heartbroken for Harry Kane who missed the penalty. Few months ago at the European Championship it was horrible, hateful emojis barely minutes after. Need one explain the difference? No. We all get it. It’s all about what the folks who missed the penalty look like. But if you watched yesterday’s match, why should anyone receive abuse? They played their heats out and Kane was brilliant. Same as the European Championship match with the 3 missed penalties – they tried their best and didn’t deserve any abuse. But we live in a sick, pathetic world!
By this morning, people want the manages, Gareth Southgate, replaced! Seriously? It beggars belief! It’s like we’ve been winning these major tournaments left, right and centre over the years and Southgate failed to?
Southgate is the best we have. Yes, he is more defensive than attacking, but would we rather have attacked and lost to the US instead of the dour draw that got us through to the next stage?
Can Southgate change a little, to be less conservative in the bigger games? I don’t see why not. Instead, we just want to dump him??!

World’s in an absolute mess!

Yes they probably need the funds but a line has to be drawn at some point

What can be achieved via these endless storytelling?

If you don’t agree with your family and you wish to be estranged, just go your separate way and get on with your life.

Harry Winsor needs to sense the lopsidedness of his situation. He will have to beg for forgiveness sooner or later, as it is highly unlikely that his marriage to Megan will last – thanks to the ill-wishers slowly gathering around them, and the relentless pressure they keep on heaping on themselves with the storytelling. They need to cut their spending and make do with the Netflix fee they earn for the latest round of storytelling and just go quiet and leave those hating on them to starve of reasons to keep hating on them

I can understand their desperation to explain themselves, be heard etc., but this is now as bad as trying to talk a brexiteer around or trying to convince a MAGA Trump supporter that America now needs to move on. Harry & Megan can tell any number of stories they want and produce any number of Netflix docuseries; those hating on them will not relent. Those hating on them are not interested in any reason nor explanation, they won’t change their position. So, other than making some money – and that will soon change as people tire of the tales – it has become pointless

There are faults on all sides

To those out there dreaming to get rich or be famous, this sorry saga should be a profound lesson. These folk race round the year seeking validation. It’s like Roman Emperors having to put on entertainment for their baying masses. Who is in control? The gladiators losing their lives to provide the show? the Emperor laying the show on? or the blood-seeking crowd for whom the show is laid out?

Unlike the policies of many other developed countries out there (a good example will be the Belgian colonisation of Congo), Britain has never sought to harm. And that, is indeed the truth, even though modern history may seek to paint some of the gory details of several periods in history in a different light.
Yes, greed sometimes set in, but if you spend enough time examining British policies, acts and legacy across the world, even where it has ended up badly or left legacies such as tribal intolerance and hierarchy, for every self-seeking buccaneer out there, you will find individuals who robustly challenged and sought to defend our core principles.

Through history, Britain has always sought to be firm but fair. Yes, some heinous chapters such as the transatlantic slavery over centuries (but even that will be challenged by some who will point to the transactions at source, but it won’t explain the barbarism of overseeing birth into slavery) or aspects of the colonial era could be seen in poor light, but a lot of it comes more from a misguided desire to enlighten as opposed to outright avarice.

We must not move away from our sense of fairness.

Yes, there must be a firm response to the current and ongoing assault on our border, in particular, via the channel. But technology and effective collaboration is what’s needed, to put a firm end to it and get back to processing all entrants via the proper route. While all that is being sorted out, there must be an immediate end to the use of these hapless migrants for political point-scoring and the unacceptable rhetoric must stop.

This is Great Britain

We are not some new kid on the block democracy! Bravo Welby!

6 presidents in 6 years, but I am sure the 7th candidate is already waiting in the wings? Where do these conveyor belt of presidents come from? You would think that the next candidate dredged up would say: “hmmm, I’m not so sure this is a gig I want to be involved in..”. NOPE. On goes the presidential sash (they love those ridiculous sashes out there in Latin America, just as much as we love medals and brooches out here..).

The last el presidente was a rural school teacher from an impoverished part of Peru, high up in the Andes. He didn’t belong to any political party and needed to form alliances to survive, but coming in with a tiny mandate off the back of a runoff with only 44,000 or so votes to win, was not going to cut it. It’s surprising he lasted 17 months

His erstwhile Vice President has now hastily been sworn in as el presidente! and I am sure the former President will now get charged with all sorts of trumped up crimes and get banged up in jail.

We need to be better! Unfortunately, ain’t gonna happen. We are what we are…..

It really is puzzling that this particular senate race went to a runoff before it could be decided

For those who call themselves conservatives and christians – and you see many of the with eyes closed and arms stretched out in prayers at the Herschel Walker gatherings – and even the loser himself, Herschel Walker, gave a short speech that end in a call for “prayer”. But surely, the basic tenets of Christianity is to be humble (not sure he called the winner to congratulate him) and decent?

Something really has to change

When you see bible-totting, prayer-quoting people, say they support people who violently entered the country’s capitol building – an event that claimed 5 or so lives – you ask yourself where is humility and decency? But then, history will tell us there was religion, religious faith, teaching etc., during all those horrible periods in human history, where people we’re burnt at the stake for being witches (usually with very scant evidence), brutally tortured, centuries of enslavement (of all races) and heinous acts, some in the very name of religion. So, perhaps one should not be too surprised to hear someone say “let us pray” and then 5 minutes later, say well done to Kyle Rittenhouse for gunning a couple of people down (even if it was the right thing for him to do, surely, with lives claimed, it is nothing to celebrate!)

But when Biden won in 2020 and stated that he will rule for all and heal etc., the choice words. He now has 2 years to go, to truly try to do so. Yes, it is very difficult to try to be nice to people who are busy trying to dig up spurious charges against your son and just want to bring you down just for the heck of it (threats of impeachment just to settle scores etc.), but he has to rise above all that and come out strongly for all Americans and try to at least breach some of this mad division, if as we all know, he can’t end it as this goes back centuries but has never been this raw, not since their civil war.

The current situation is simply not sustainable! How long can the common-sense folk hold out for? If not Raphael Warnock today, it’ll be someone Els tomorrow. We cannot always hope common-sense will prevail. At some point it won’t. And the outcome could be devastating! Herschel Walker in senate is one example. It just beggars belief! It should matter what your politics is or what you believe in, when it comes to the highest offices of government, you simply cannot have a lack of decency. People refusing to concede election defeat, people not calling their opponents to congratulate them, an outgoing president refusing to welcome the incoming one and refusing to observe the requirements of handing over power (setting aside the attempts to derail the handover for a minute): these are not occurrences that should be happening in a democracy, let alone in the United States of America!

Warnock now needs to come out strong for ALL of Georgia, including those who supported Walker. He needs to come out strongly to state and mean that. This madness simply cannot continue!

I read a BBC article on Haiti this morning and it paints a vivid picture of what lawlessness looks like!

When people complain about law enforcement measures such as ‘stop & search’, yes, it is unfortunate if it is wrongly used or perceived to target some groups. But given the current spate of stabbings and shootings, it is clearly a very necessary measure and technology is what’s required, to remove the embarrassing aspect of it. Can we not have a knife/gun detection satellite of sorts, that can accurately detect and pinpoint those carrying weapons, so that stop & searches are specifically targeted instead or random?

But back to Haiti. What a tragedy! The levels of crime and homicide has apparently become impossible to police. Instead, people are fleeing the capital. Just imagine that!

Unfortunately, a very complex situation. Brings back memories of articles I read years ago, relating to South Africa. The article surmised that when a group of people have had to live through decades of being made to feel their life means little and they are not worth the effort, they begin to believe that themselves and develop an uncaring attitude to life, and when they can, they unleash the most unthinkable violence on each other.

One can only imagine that following years of poverty and deprivation, the various gangs that have now pretty much taken over Haiti’s capital city, are groups with little care for the taking of human life. Is there a solution?

Law enforcement on its own, cannot be expected to solve these situations! This is a socioeconomic problem. We simply cannot watch on, till people get to that point, where they can just stab or shoot someone else and casually walk away, and off to stab or shoot their next target! If you look at the recent and ongoing spate of violence in many parts of the world, it tends to follow on from deprivation and hopelessness. While that is never a tenable excuse for mindless violence, it is where the solution can be found. We have to avoid situations where people get to a state where it doesn’t bother them to just casually take a life. Whether the reason is evil or mental health or whatever society would like to call it, we have to find a way to avoid leaving sections of society to rot to such levels.

With all that Haiti’s been through; earthquakes and the rest, one would expect a high degree of people caring for each other, but unfortunately, combined with years and years of deprivation, it’s flipped the other way and the gangs that have taken over their capital, appear very willing to unleash horror!
If the Haitian government could sort itself out, find the means for a socioeconomic revival, create jobs, bring back hope; then train and equip law enforcement and as many community groups as possible for a robust stand-off to clear out these armed gangs, then they could take steps to chart a new path for Haiti. Unfortunately, it’s unlikely to happen and theirs will be a continuing story of mindless violence. How sad…

Richarlison (Brazil) scores an awesome individual goal at the World Cup yesterday (Nov 24) and the BBC commentator says: “what a wonderful goal…”. He could have stopped there but later continued: …”what this Brazilian shirt does! he isn’t scoring many for Spurs (his UK employer) but can’t stop scoring for Brazil”…

That, in a nutshell is what we are.. (Brits)

And that is why our social media is riddled with abuse and horrid words..

We just can’t help ourselves. We have to add a sly dig every time..

Our glass is never half empty, it is always half full..

But it is what it is and we are what we are….

when people get used to that, they get to understand us. It’s usually without malice…

It is a real shame that the people most detrimentally impacted by Brexit are the same ones erroneously supporting it for the very wrong reasons! And the people least impacted by immigration are the ones whipped into a frenzy and made to believe it is the source of every evil!

A right shame indeed!

After years and years of watching the bureaucratic drama that is the EU, and hundreds of unelected bureaucrats turning each and every aspect of life within the EU into a needlessly messy, complicated mountain to bureaucracy, seemingly attempting to strip member states of every ounce of self-determination (and I use the word “seemingly” as that is indeed not the intention of the EU, it just feels that way, as the paper-pushers have made it so, albeit, unintentionally) while centralising every minute decision, which is not the way Brits like to live our life, it simply got too much for many Brits and they had had enough of the EU. But had they had all the true facts presented to them, no Brit would chose to exit the EU, if it meant their children could go hungry and conditions worsen in the most deprived parts of the country. There were talks of hard Brexits and soft Brexits etc. Leaving the EU should have been in stages, to test the impact first, then re-consult (could even be another referendum after the first stage) to ensure Brits have a chance to decide how much hardship is worth it, just to get away from a bureaucratic organisation. Even if taking the full impact in one blast, is the most expedient option, the impact – that few could accurately predict as it was simply not known as nobody had quit the EU before now – needed to have been fully understood and mitigated, but the EU was unlikely to sit about for us to figure all that out, given the way Brexit unfolded. There are faults on all sides. Brexit should never have descended into such acrimony. If the EU believe what they have is a good thing, then they should have just laughed off Britain’s decision to leave and said good riddance. Instead, they wanted to make an example of us, in order to deter others from leaving. As for Brits, if a majority of the country (and it was a very slight majority, which should not have been an acceptable margin to embark on such a critical move) had had enough of the EU and the bureaucracy, past governments should have listened to the growing concerns are forced the EU to pay attention 15, 20 years ago, to ease-up on dictating the type of light bulbs people can use within the EU and the ridiculous level of detail to which they were seeking to impact or dictate everyday life in member countries! (which is what grates with many Brits). Instead, past UK governments treated dissenters with disdain and we saw them as a tiny minority with unfounded anti-EU sentiments. Well, that minority grew to a majority – thin or not – and shocked the establishment with the outcome of the Brexit referendum, whether or not there was a number of falsehood peddled by some.

Rejoining the EU cannot possibly be an option at this point in time. It will be too problematic. Explaining the real impact of Brexit without trying to say “told you so!” is what is needed. Nobody knew the full impact – not even those that opposed Brexit. Either way, neither side bothered to apply diplomacy. It appeared to be more about who’s right. At this point in time, what needs to be made clear, is what’s attributable to Brexit, Covid, war in Ukraine etc. And then, finding a way forward. The ill-conceived notion that the poor work harder than the rich and as such, deserve better, is a fallacy. Elon Musk working odd hours is not to be discounted because he is the world’s richest man. He may well be working out of choice and in a comfortable office compared to a toilet cleaner, but work is work!

The reality of Brexit is that the low-income folk clamouring for it, are the very ones facing the hardship that it brings and yet, fail to realise that. The people who sold Brexit to them (Nigel Farage, Boris Johnson and co) will always be able to feed their children…

The situation with immigration and illegal entry into the UK via the English Channel is not hugely dissimilar. It needs explaining. Needs honesty. The present and past government and/or politicians who repeatedly used this topic to win votes should not have done so, as it has simply made the situation toxic. Honest action is what’s required and was required. Demonising human beings is never a way forward. The reality is that nobody could deliver what was being promised, because there were rules that could not and humanely should not be contravened e.g. you can’t go and upend the rubber boats and leave illegal migrants to drown. All the time spent making empty promises should have been spent making housing available to British people who require it and benefits, so that when it came to helping to settle migrants – once processed – people won’t hate on them. Technology and coordination with France is the only way to end the channel crossings, not empty promises – as we have now finally realised. Years wasted creating a ‘hostile environment’ supposedly to deter illegal migrants have been an absolute waste of time and resources and has totally backfired, with the hostility created now being visited on each other. The topic has become so toxic that there were some people celebrating the drowning of human beings trying to cross the channel – we (Brits) never used to be so uncaring! People can loath illegal migration all they want, but you have to draw a line, when the body of a children washes on shore! It is simply not human to wish that on any parent!
The reality is very simple. We must end illegal entry by using technology and other humane means; fast processing etc. End wars and displacement of people. But above all else, change the toxic rhetoric! Our economy is suffering and struggling right now due to lack of migrants with many of the skills we simply haven’t got. That is being mixed up in the Brexit and illegal migration mess and toxic rhetoric. We also need to do more – a great deal more – for low income earners in Britain and Brits who are presently struggling to make ends meet. In return, Brits need to turn back to reality and turn our back on dishonest, hateful rhetoric: the 60,000 Albanians or Syrians or whoever, rocking up in boats across the English Channel are not the reason we have failed repeatedly over the years to build more council housing or to maintain (mould everywhere!) existing housing, create jobs for underprivileged and sort out a number of issues such as knife crimes, other crime, anti-social behaviour etc. We have dropped the ball in many areas and sousing these unfortunate illegal migrants as the all-encompassing excuse is just not right nor decent!
We can fix it. We just need honesty and a stop to hateful rhetoric used to mask inefficiency

Yes, many of our Members of Parliament these days lack credibility and are just in it for themselves, BUT, the abuse they receive via Twitter and the rest of social media is absolutely reprehensible!

It is a job and nobody should have to put up with this sort of abuse at any job!

The BBC article today, which states MP receive thousands of abuse daily, is so sad. It has to be addressed and addressed decisively. Whatever it takes. It must be stopped. Whether or not an MP is deemed to be performing or not, they were elected by a majority and it is a job!!!!

The technology is there, to block, find and penalise these abusers. Society has not just become so rotten, it always was rotten, but these sad abusers can just laze about in the rooms doling out abuse by the minute! There must be consequences!

Many MPs now work in fear. They can’t really debate key issues properly. Either way, nobody deserves such abuse in doing their job!

Personally, I couldn’t care less whether or not people wish to use colour to differentiate one human being from another. afterall, we use the same logic for cars, bags etc.

However, why not get it right?

How is you-know-whom white? (perhaps orange?)

How is Megan Markle black? (perhaps pasty-cream?)

It can’t be that difficult to define an accurate spectrum to fit everyone. It may even help the police apprehend fleeing criminals better…

And if some folk still think they are white (ghosts will likely be offended, but ok..), fine.

I would presume there will be some shades of pink, some shades of brown, perhaps some shades of black too, orange of course (for you know whom) and some other interesting colours

That should get some accuracy into it and give the world some breathing space from the presently suffocating white v black crap! It is just too bloody convenient!

I always feel for the Chinese, Japanese and a few others whom the world just conveniently leave out like they don’t exist?! They have been left out of the colour option. And then you have Southeast Asians who are now regularly referred to as non-white! seriously?! “The UK gets its first non-white Prime Minister”. Poor fella. We couldn’t even do him the honour of giving him a colour. I wonder what the motive would be (or has been, over the years), not to adopt this broader, wider, more accurate range of colour-coding of humans? Strength in numbers? your guess is as good as mine!

It is definitely time to get this correct, so we can stop alienating people who are neither white (ghosts are fed up!) nor black

Homes and parents are frequently blamed, but when you look at the volume of time children spend at school and when you look at recent WhatsApp exposés of heinous messages many teachers were caught exchanging, it is clear that what kids are taught and how they are treated in our schools is a contributing factor to the ongoing mess

When we were kids and went to football matches at the weekend and you see the raw hate between rival fans, most of us left it at singing insults etc., but when you leave the stadium and see pools of blood by the roadside and cars keyed, shops vandalised etc., you begin to notice that some of the hatred encourage during matches have been allowed to go too far

I do not believe there is a more severe mental ailment than hate. But the dilemma today, is that it has now become so brazen and there are no consequences. Hate is now acceptable. It’s all over social media and in our politics and I am not referring to any specific form of hatred such as racism or antisemitism, I am referring to all forms of hate, regardless of who’s directing it or to whom it’s directed. You look at the matter of migration or more specifically, illegal migration: yes, it must be sorted, as it is simply not good for anyone (including the illegal migrants) as the world cannot presently operate in a format where people can just barge into any country without due process. BUT for goodness sake, there is no need to treat them like animals or pile on the hate. They are still human beings. It is the government’s job to find a means of sorting it, and I am certain technology is what’s needed to put an end to illegal migration. But the rhetoric has become so dangerous that we are endangering lives

At present, the situation looks hopeless. Hate is winning massively everywhere you look. I honestly do not know how one can take just one look at someone and build up so much hate towards them; has to be a mental illness for sure.

These are dire times!!

I do not have all the answers, but some of these issues have clearly not been treated to any basic reasoning:

Rwanda – how can it ever work? Surely, for it to be an effectively deterrent, then it will need to fail and Rwanda will need to be an absolute hell-hole of a destination right? Because if it works, and people trying to enter the UK illegally without just cause get deported to Rwanda and end up with an awesome life and do well there, then many more will be happy to make the journey to the UK illegally, to get deported to Rwanda. Now, if Rwanda doesn’t work and it becomes a hellish nightmare for anyone sent there, then, you do have an effective deterrent BUT, is that what we would want to spend taxpayers money on? But if assuming Rwanda works, we have already seen what happens in African countries where newcomers thrive e.g. Liberia, Sierra Leone; it riles the locals and you could end up with genocide or wars due to the discontent of those locals. As such, to make this Rwanda thing work, you would first have to lift all Rwandans out of poverty so that they do not risk getting jealous of what the UK-deportees get. But the minute you succeed in improving life for existing Rwandans, surely, they will then not be interested in their country being the dumping ground for migrants deported from the U.K. right? So, I simply cannot see any positive outcome here…

What do migrants come to the UK for? surely not the weather! So, safety, and for some (economic migrants, which is nothing illegal) to make quick cash. Many of those in government today, have parents who came to the UK for either of those reasons. So, what can reduce migrants coming here? Could it be that perhaps if they find safety elsewhere and are able to make money elsewhere? —— could that “elsewhere” be where they are from? ——- I think sooner or later, it will be clear to the whole world, that the only way to deal with illegal migration, people smuggling etc., same as dealing with drugs, is to address the source; address the reasons behind it. With drugs, we do not wish to address the source of ‘demand’, but spend effort trying to address the supply. Similarly, with illegal migration, or migration in general, we know that if we make wars illegal and totally unacceptable and if we can help the whole world develop and progress, more people will be happy where they are and won’t get displaced etc. But hey! Nobody wants to hear that. It’s too leftish! It’s socialist thinking. Let them fend for themselves. Let the markets dictate. Let the strongest survive etc.

One thing is clear, it undermines the UK, if people can just cross in via boats across the channel. It is a breach that must be addressed. Could technology be the answer? There must be a way to secure our borders, perhaps a mid-sea or mid-channel floating processing centre and drones with cameras and other gadgets that detect entry and we can get people duly processed at floating centres (safe, secure and healthy conditions) on the channel. Or come up wi5 a global satellite that remotely maps and collects all our details remotely (so we don’t have to tag people) and as such, can remotely confirm where each individual have been and where they have come from etc. (so that applications can me processed accurately and quickly). While in parallel, we try to resolve the wider issues.

There must be humane options to address this, without us losing our humanity. Afterall, these are people too. The terms ‘migrant’, ‘illegal migrants’ etc., need not strip their humanity away. Yes, it has been a headache and there doesn’t appear to be a solution, but we must try to find a humane solution…

……those Jews

……those blacks

……those gypsies

the minute we generalise in this manner, we begin to display our bias.

if you are angered by a Jewish person or a black person (that is why the recent story relating to actor, Liam Neeson faced some backlash but could have been a lot more, had he not been one of those who tend to be upfront) or any other grouping, take umbrage with the individual. Visiting your anger on an entire group of people is just an excuse to be horrid

unfortunately, this is where society is today. we generalise. ‘migrants’, any type, regardless of their situation, are now tarred with how illegal migrants are perceived.

the ongoing furore regarding Kanye or Ye West. “Jews” does he know every Jew? but clearly, it is a mental health issue. he can’t possibly be right in the head.

it is the same problem affecting policing the the US and many other countries, where we write off certain groups and build up an image of what we automatically expect a drug dealer to look like (but we forget about the buyer…), we automatically expect a whole group to be one way or the other, and that ideology becomes accepted

such generalisation needs to end..

Every time I log on my computer, there is a story of a machete attack in London or elsewhere in the UK!
Unfortunately, this coincides with public trust in the police being at an all time low, for a number of incidents involving social media posts by serving police officers etc. Our police must urgently find a way to cleanup within its ranks, to restore public trust, which should increase the volume of information they receive and assistance from the public, to crack down on crime

The current spate of machete attacks is embarrassing really! Who makes these machetes?! It’s now like a dressing accessory in the UK. Get your shoes on, your wrist watch, grab your iPhone and oh, don’t forget your machete!
Seriously??!!!

There needs to be a total crackdown on knives, machetes, guns etc. And if people want to beat each other up going forward, well, they need to go and get boxing lessons!
This incessant knifing in a supposedly developed country has become an absolute aberration! Just read about yet another machete incident this evening, which was just a random, unprovoked attack on a bus!

Heaven help us if this is allowed to become normal!

Today everyone’s setting on the new Prime Minister! Yes, some of his appointments to cabinet are perhaps questionable, BUT for goodness sake! What would people have him do??? If he doesn’t appoint some of the people he has, they will have an issue with him and the in-fighting will continue

He isn’t going to call a general election as the result will be awful for his party. If the opposition can force a general election by going on strike? could be the right move. But before that, we cannot choke yet another prime minister for the conservatives to appoint another???!

The prudent move would be for people to back off him unless they can force a general election

…. well, now we know who’s in control! what’s the use of a general election, when market factors can depose a Prime Minister….

What the feck does that mean????

The press eagerly use “white”, “black (even for individuals such as Barack Obama and Megan Markle)”, is “brown” a taboo then?

What the heck is “non-white”? does red, green, indigo etc all count as “non-white”?

We might as well just use “white” and “non-white” then? why bother with naming any other colour? Jeez! What is wrong with the world today????

More importantly, who cares what colour he is? If the party he leads go on to win a general election, that may well be worth some trumpeting. At this juncture, we have a lot more important stuff to sort..

… Not about loyalty to an individual

Unfortunately, we are in troubling times, which tests democracy to its core

was Rishi Sunak disloyal to Boris Johnson? Simple answer is YES.

was Sunak’s disloyalty to Johnson due to Sunak’s decision to be loyal to the country instead? Only Sunak can answer that question

In my humble opinion, Boris was the architect of his own downfall. However, it may also be down to too much wheeling & dealing, leading to a situation where he becomes so beholden to his mates that when they err, he cannot bring himself to deal with them. Anyone thinking partygate was what brought Johnson down has it all wrong. Yes, partygate was damaging, but majority in the country were willing to accept that it was not a sackable offence, but in combination with his attempts to change rules in order to hand his buddies a free pass when they were caught misbehaving….

But had Boris not tried to strong-arm Sajid Javid the then Chancellor, leading to Javid’s resignation, Rishi Sunak, would have remained a junior minister in the shadow of Javid for several years to come. But it was Boris, who after dispensing with Javid, promoted Rishi to the lofty height of Chancellor. The rest as they say, is history

Between them all, they’ve done irreparable damage to the country (with the division of Brexit and the rise and rise of intolerance, to such heights that we thought we left behind in the 80s and years before that) and to the Conservative Party. They could all have supported Theresa May and she could also have tried to be less forceful. Instead, they schemed and schemed, plotted and plotted, and now, we have a musical chairs scenario and our reputation as a sensible, financially stable country is left in tatters!
From David Cameron who should have not looked down on the people asking for Brexit and simply gave them the facts, to the people who exploited Brexit to their own ends even though they knew it was never going to be readily implementable, to the schemers who could have helped Theresa May instead of ousting her, to the cluelessness on the last 3 months; I do not see what Sunak can do to avoid being forced to call a General Election by the end of March 2023, which will result in the Conservative Party becoming the 3rd party in the UK, behind Labour and the Lib Dems. The die is cast. The people have had enough and will have their say.

To rebuild, the Conservative Party will need to start from scratch and it will need to be about loyalty to the country and its people, over loyalty to a Party Leader or any other individual.

Most will perceive it as bullying and it often is or turns into exactly that. But we tend not to take each other too seriously in the UK and you throw as much as you catch. But the present generation, perhaps with social media, which can amplify and intensify banter to a point where it clearly crosses the line from just words, to very harmful words with horrid endings (there’s been a recent spate of suicides etc.) has soured this British pastime

I recall during university days up in the north of England, how our generation – unlike the present generation – savaged each other with banter, with everyone giving as good as they got, and there were few lines. Everything was up for grabs: race, gender, the whole lot. And in reality, have we actually made any true progress with all the present hash-tags and toppling of statues?

Self-deprecating words were always popular; you hit yourself hard so others are left with very little to hit you with. It is the British way. But today’s society has taken all that away. Anything you say can cause offence with one group or the other. And that is quite understandable that all utterances have consequences, if in poor taste. But it has all been taken too far and largely way out of context. People have not improved. It would seem shootings and stabbings have simply taken over from what used to be frank exchanges of words…

After Conservative party MPs (duly elected by their constituents to represent them) voted overwhelmingly for Rishi Sunak in September only to have that decision overruled by some 200,000 or so registered members of the party, who are largely, ill-informed semi-illiterates who only wish to hear terms such as ‘Brexit’, regardless of the impact, the Conservative party elites knew they couldn’t take that chance again, as clearly, anyone but the most sensible choice for the country (Sunak) – in the absence of a general election – was what the conservative members would have gone for, out of some misguided loyalty to Boris Johnson or more honestly, because they cannot see how a non-white chap can be UK PM (mad ain’t it? you would think that with the mess our economy is in, who cares what blooming colour the PM is!? as long as he can get some decisions made and reverse the mad direction we were heading in as a country, with the pound tanking so badly!). He could be green for all I care! Majority of Brits also do not care; could be a woman, man, white, brown, black, whatever colour, we are just fed up with crap and we would vote for any capable folk – given the two options of Sunak or Mordaunt, and given the circumstances, it simply has to be the one with the most senior cabinet experience and in any case, he came second the last run! So, they made the requirement such that whichever candidate secured the most MP support would sail through and make it difficult for any challenger and avoid having to go to the members vote; who can blame them, after the September result from party members that gave us Truss?

Ok, it is possible that Sunak will turn out to be as incapable or hindered as Truss, but goodness me!, at least he was selected by the people elected to be clever enough to make decisions; the people who have the most facts and information to make that decision (MPs) and not a bunch of semi-illiterates who are hellbent of imposing their stupidity on the nation

So, whichever way you look at it, we’ll done Sir Brady and the 1922 committee. Phew!

We still must have a general election urgently though. I predict that will be the case by Feb

Everyone saw Boris Johnson as a buffoon for years, before he became Mayor of London. He was never a buffoon; he was simply a text-book wheeler-dealer who seeks to relive what he sees as classic English politics, but unfortunately, he finds himself in a wrong era. We are no longer in the 50s…

If Boris could (but he can’t) cut out the wheeling and dealing, to simply serve in government, I don’t see anyone cleverer than he, in the present UK political set-up (across all parties). Going around staying at friends’ villas etc., is never without implications. How would you later deal with those individuals were they to cross the line? That has always been his Achilles Heel. His reluctance to deal with his erring buddies makes him vulnerable as a leader.

His supposed decision to make a comeback is really not the issue right now; the issue is all about those MPs who are coming out in support of that decision. What happens I& the Privileges Committee conclude their investigation in a few weeks and confirm Boris misled parliament? These MPs presently stating they want to reinstate him would have surely demonstrated their inability to make the right judgement? They should all lose their seats in parliament at the next general election surely!

Do the Conservative party presently have any candidate that’s better than Boris? Simple answer is: No. Even with his flaws and alleged lies, he is smarter than Rishi, Mordaunt and others put together. Why? because he got the nation to believe he is a buffoon, for years, while he plotted his path to the premiership!

A general election is the only solution and it is where we will end up shortly, despite ongoing efforts to avoid it

….. some plotting ludicrous returns…??
jeez!!!!!

….now, that’s more accurate! her mini-budget…

If his decision not to run (again) for PM, then, bravo to him! Correct decision. And not because he probably won’t succeed yet again, but because he said earlier in the week that he wouldn’t. Refreshing that someone finally say something and stand by it…

Well done